5/9 Cubs Inbox

As we celebrate the anniversary of the last cycle by a Cubs batter (Mark Grace, May 9, 1993, vs. the Padres), it’s time for a Cubs Inbox. Have a question? Send it to: CubsInbox@gmail.com. Here goes.

Q: Who leads Major League Baseball in blown saves since 2008 — individual and by team — and where do the Cubs and Carlos Marmol rank? I know it’s not a friendly stat but I am curious. — Steve T., Phoenix, AZ

A: Here you go:

Most blown saves: 2008-13

1. Heath Bell, Jonathan Broxton, Chad Qualls, 30 each
4. Kevin Gregg, 29
5. J.J. Putz, 27
6. Carlos Marmol, 26
7. Juan Carlos Oviedo, 24
8. Rafael Betancourt, Tyler Clippard and Jonathan Papelbon, 23 each
12. Jon Rauch and Fernando Rodney, 22 each

Most blown saves, teams 2008-2013
1. Brewers, 123 blown saves
2. Nationals, 121
3. Orioles, 119
4. Marlins, 117
5. Rockies and Mets, 113
7. Mariners, 112
8. Angels, 111
9. Cubs and Cardinals, 110

This season, the Diamondbacks have two pitchers who lead MLB in blown saves: J.J. Putz (4) and David Hernandez (3). The Cubs’ Shawn Camp and Carlos Marmol both have two blown saves. Here are the individual leaders since ’08:

2012: John Axford, Brewers, 9 blown saves (Marmol 3)
2011: Marmol, 10 (tied with Angels’ Jordan Walden, 10)
2010: Tyler Clippard, Nationals, 10 (Marmol 5)
2009: Brad Lidge, Phillies, 11 (Marmol 4)
2008: Manuel Corpas, Rockies, and Kevin Gregg, Marlins, 9 each (Marmol 2)

2012: Brewers, 29 blown saves (Cubs 21 blown saves)
2011: Nationals, 27 blown saves (Cubs 24)
2010: Orioles, 27 blown saves (Cubs 14)
2009: Mariners, 28 blown saves (Cubs 18)
2008: Mariners, 31 blown saves (Cubs 24)

Q: Carlos Marmol had all spring to get it together. I say, release him, and bring up Chris Rusin. What say you? — Louis M., San Marcos, CA

A: Marmol went through the same rough start last year. The difference this season is that Dale Sveum acted sooner. Since the May 4 game against the Reds, Marmol has made two appearances, given up two hits and walked one over 2 1/3 innings, and has not allowed a run. It seems he needs to hit rock bottom. Last season, Marmol was able to get back on track after the All-Star break, posting a 1.52 ERA in 30 games, and going 12-for-13 in save situations. Marmol has to realize he’s not unhittable.

“He thinks that guys are going to swing at every pitch out of his hand, and he tries to make every pitch a two-strike pitch and that’s part of the problem,” pitching coach Chris Bosio said of the right-hander. “He tries to bury the pitch and overthrow the pitch. He needs to back off. A lot of times, doing too much can be a deterrent. You’re not relaxed, you’re not getting the spin on the ball, you’re not working over the top of the ball, you’re working under the ball. Get him to relax and get him to where he was the second half of last year. That’s where we all want him to be and that’s where he wants to be.”

This is the last year of Marmol’s three-year contract, and he is being paid $9.8 million. It’s too early in the year to just dump him. He’s one of the seven pitchers in the Cubs’ bullpen, and Bosio and Sveum have to figure out a way for him to contribute.

As for Rusin, I’d keep him at Triple-A Iowa and let him develop as a starter. He has a bright future.

Q: I’m wondering why Scott Hairston is not being considered an every day outfielder after hitting 20 home runs last year? How many at-bats is he projected to get this year? — Anthon S., Seattle

A: I can’t give you a number for how many at-bats Hairston will get this year but do know he hasn’t done enough to warrant every day status. Hairston batted .172 (10-for-58) this spring, and he’s batting .132 (5-for-38) so far. Plus, he’s been used in a platoon against left-handed pitchers, and is 3-for-30 and all three hits have been home runs.

Q: After this year, what will happen to Fitch Park and HoHoKam Stadium in Mesa? Do the Cubs own either facility? Would any other Major League team be interested in coming in and rehabbing the facilities? — Don W., Simpsonville, SC

A: The Athletics will be moving into HoHoKam and Fitch after signing a 20-year lease with the city. However, there won’t be spring games scheduled there for 2014. The A’s have plans to do some remodeling at HoHoKam, including widening the seats, installing a video scoreboard and updating the clubhouse. The Cubs have to remove all of their stuff from the two facilities at the end of this year.

Q: I just wanted to say, three years ago, I got a 4×4 Cubs alternate jersey logo tattooed over my heart. I cannot wait to put “World Champions” over it when we win it all. — Chuck L., Janesville, WI

A: I’m sure the Cubs appreciate the support but I think I would’ve gone with “Mom” instead.

11 Comments

Soriano went through the same rough start he had last year yet Sveum decided to NOT act sooner in HIS case, just Marmol’s case…..hmmmmm……hypocrisy anybody??? Part of the reason Hariston didn’t get much playing time even though the chances of him outperforming Soriano during the month of April were pretty good.

hairston would not have out produced Soriano ……… geez the stuff you just throw out of your mouth is mind blowing

I would rather know blown saves since 2012. Who cares about 2008 or 2009? Not me.

Carrie, if Sveum elected to act sooner with Soriano and replace him with Hariston JUST FOR THE FIRST SIX WEEKS thus avoiding yet another miserable, horrendous, inadequate start to the season by our CLEAN UP hitter we may have seen Haiston’s numbers extrapolated to: AB’s from 38 to 123, HR’s from 3 to 9 and RBI’s from 7 to 21. Seems to me there was a reasonable chance of that happening based on Hairston’s limited playing time, not to mention he would have been a better defensive outfielder than Soriano. Soriano’s numbers? AB’s 123, HR’s 3, RBI’s 10.
(who wouldn’t have chance of out-prodcuing THOSE numbers? Hell, Colvin and CAMPANA might have! HA!) Sveum probably had an idea those weak numbers were coming from Soriano but wouldn’t dare rock the Soriano MVP/HOF boat. Looks like Hairston might not have been the only one capable of out producing Soriano the first six weeks. Well, there’s always next year. Unless of course the Baseball Gods smile upon all of Cubdom and a trade or retirement happens first!

In fact, just a few more RBI’s from a clean up hitter and who knows? We may have won a few more of those one run games Sveum keeps obsessing over.

ya cause why not put a guy who hit sub .150 in spring training in the OF in the #4 slot? YOu are right makes total sense…… NOT….

You’re on to something Mamma however competitive in ALL games is pushing it just a little bit don’t you think? Have you forgotten the few if not handful of games that had too many errors? I think Sveum’s stubbornness regarding the insistence of playing Soriano throughout a horrendous first month + is more unforgivable than his bullpen/closer decisions. He had capable replacements on hand to at least give Soriano a few days off in a row on several occasions but it didn’t happen, history repeated itself and Sveum should not be surprised as he and we know that history indeed will repeat itself if ignored. He ignored last April and early May and has paid the price this season. Will it happen next season? Let’s hope the decision is taken
out of Sveum’s hands and Soriano is long gone. And Marmol too for that matter.
I get the feeling Sveum would be happier than you, me and White should both Soriano and Marmol be gone within the month. Then he would have no pressure to play the inferior vets and he would then FINALLY begin to manage….???

Pingback: Kameron Loe Has Elected Free Agency and Other Bullets | Bleacher Nation | Chicago Cubs News, Rumors, and Commentary

Soriano’s April/early May numbers (again for the mentally challenged) AB’s 123, HR’s 3, RBI’s 10. Not too difficult to outperform those Herculean stats…

Pingback: Hire Jim Essian - The Muskbox is a Celebration of Chubby Chasers

OK Mamma but all that you just described does NOT sound competitive to me. Granted the starting pitching has been very competitive but the surrounding 8….eh, not so much. Was Soriano even competing with any opposition’s clean up batters for RBI’s? No. We were “in” most games but that (excuse me, to me at least) does not equate to being competitive (as a TEAM) in most games. With such a lack luster offense, we were more lucky than competitive.
No offense friend, love your comments!!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 261 other followers

%d bloggers like this: